Buy Aceon | Cheap Aceon | Buy Aceon Online
Buy Aceon | Cheap Aceon | Buy Aceon Online
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Galleries
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
Buy Aceon | Cheap Aceon | Buy Aceon Online Forum Index
->
Buy Aceon | Cheap Aceon | Buy Aceon Online
Post a reply
Username
Subject
Message body
Emoticons
View more Emoticons
Font colour:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
White
Black
Font size:
Tiny
Small
Normal
Large
Huge
Close Tags
Options
HTML is
OFF
BBCode
is
ON
Smilies are
ON
Disable BBCode in this post
Disable Smilies in this post
Confirmation code: *
All times are GMT + 2 Hours
Jump to:
Select a forum
Jakaś kategoria
----------------
Buy Aceon | Cheap Aceon | Buy Aceon Online
Topic review
Author
Message
cheapbag214s
Posted: Thu 22:45, 07 Nov 2013
Post subject: WASHINGTON
House committee advances bill on Keystone XL pipeline
WASHINGTON, April 25 () -- A bill advanced by the House Natural Resources Committee would prevent President Obama from delaying the Keystone XL pipeline, the committee chairman said.The full House committee voted 24-17 in favor of the Northern Route Approval Act, a measure that would make it easier for pipeline company TransCanada to build the cross-border Keystone XL pipeline.Committee Chairman U.S. Rep. Doc Hastings, R-Wash., blamed Obama blocking the pipeline."This important legislation will prevent the Obama administration from imposing further delays on the Keystone XL pipeline and I look forward to further action on this bill from the full House of Representatives,[url=http://www.ksacinc.com/cheapgucci/?]cheap gucci bags[/url]," he said in a statement.Concerns about the pipeline's route through Nebraska forced TransCanada to revise Keystone XL plans, creating a headache for supporters. Canadian officials have defended their environmental record against claims that production of tar sands oil, the type designated for Keystone XL, leads to more greenhouse gas emissions.A report from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency doubted a U.S. State Department assessment that questioned some of the emission figures. Hastings looked to the State Department's report as evidence the pipeline would have "no significant environmental impacts."
fora.pl
- załóż własne forum dyskusyjne za darmo
Powered by
phpBB
© 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Regulamin