Buy Aceon | Cheap Aceon | Buy Aceon Online
Buy Aceon | Cheap Aceon | Buy Aceon Online
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Galleries
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
Buy Aceon | Cheap Aceon | Buy Aceon Online Forum Index
->
Buy Aceon | Cheap Aceon | Buy Aceon Online
Post a reply
Username
Subject
Message body
Emoticons
View more Emoticons
Font colour:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
White
Black
Font size:
Tiny
Small
Normal
Large
Huge
Close Tags
Options
HTML is
OFF
BBCode
is
ON
Smilies are
ON
Disable BBCode in this post
Disable Smilies in this post
Confirmation code: *
All times are GMT + 2 Hours
Jump to:
Select a forum
Jakaś kategoria
----------------
Buy Aceon | Cheap Aceon | Buy Aceon Online
Topic review
Author
Message
cheapbag214s
Posted: Fri 2:46, 01 Nov 2013
Post subject: profit motives
Open-access science journals slammed for poor reviews, profit motives
LOS ANGELES, Oct. 3 () -- An error-ridden science paper submitted in an effort to expose unethical academic publishers was accepted by 157 open-access science journals,[url=http://www.tinfoti.com]Cheap Christian Louboutin[/url], its author says.The sting operation by the journal Science uncovered problematic and unethical behavior by publishers of "fee for publication" journals, some of which resort to false addresses, use overseas bank accounts and routinely provide only superficial "peer reviews," the Los Angeles Times reported Thursday."From humble and idealistic beginnings a decade ago, open-access scientific journals have mushroomed into a global industry, driven by author publication fees rather than traditional subscriptions," Science contributing correspondent John Bohannon, who wrote the hoax paper, wrote in a report on the operation.Bohannon put together a spurious and fatally flawed study on a purported cure for cancer -- including purposeful blunders that should have been detected during a proper review -- to 304 open-access journals.A worrying total of 157 journals accepted it,[url=http://www.tinfoti.com]Christian Louboutin Men[/url], Bohannon said, while only 98 rejected it. The remaining 49 did not respond, he said.Many of the journals accepting the paper demanded fees of thousands of dollars for publication.Some of the open-access journals Bohannon submitted his paper to did prove to be professional in their practices, Bohannon acknowledged."Some open-access journals that have been criticized for poor quality control provided the most rigorous peer review of all," Bohannon wrote.The flagship journal of the Public Library of Science, PLoS ONE, was the only journal that called attention to the paper's potential ethical problems, he noted.
fora.pl
- załóż własne forum dyskusyjne za darmo
Powered by
phpBB
© 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Regulamin