cheapbag214s
Joined: 27 Jun 2013
Posts: 16004
Read: 0 topics
Warns: 0/5 Location: England
|
Posted: Sat 13:48, 27 Jul 2013 Post subject: Unlike Schedule I drugs |
|
|
and reproducible; (2) There must be adequate safetystudies; (3) There must be adequate and well-controlled studies provingefficacy; (4) The drug must be accepted by qualified experts; and (5) Thescientific evidence must be widely available." Unlike Schedule I drugs, federal law permits individuals to obtain ScheduleII, III,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], IV, or V drugs for personal medical use with a valid prescription (citations omitted by me).The plaintiffs in this case asked the DEA to reclassify marijuana in 2002. The DEA then submitted the request to the DHHS. It took four years for the DHHS to conclude that such a re-classification was unjustified. And then it took the DEA five more years to formally deny the plaintiffs' request for a re-classification of the drug. To offer some perspective on the slow march in play here,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], during the nine-year span from 2002 to 2011 during which this issue was live before the DEA nine states and the District of Columbia passed medical marijuana laws.The D.C. circuit now again picks up the trail. Why
The post has been approved 0 times
|
|