cheapbag214s
Joined: 27 Jun 2013
Posts: 16004
Read: 0 topics
Warns: 0/5 Location: England
|
Posted: Sat 13:48, 27 Jul 2013 Post subject: the since-departed Arnold Schwarzenegger |
|
|
is consistent with a centuries-old judicial concept: never decide what you don't really have to decide, especially when you have a plausible excuse for not deciding it. Here, the 9th Circuit blamed the not-completely-unexpected detour on the lack of "controlling state precedent" on the question of what to do with an appeal where, as here, both the sitting governor (the since-departed Arnold Schwarzenegger) and the sitting attorney general (the since made-governor Jerry Brown) refused to carry it out.By diverting the case away from the federal courts and toward the state supreme court,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], by asking for clarification of state law by and from the state's highest court, the 9th Circuit has almost certainly delayed a substantive ruling on the merits of the case for at least a year and likely longer. The standing issue will likely have to be briefed all over again before the state high court, and a new oral argument date will likely have to be set,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], and then a new vigil
The post has been approved 0 times
|
|